Clustered Defaults
نویسنده
چکیده
Defaults in a credit portfolio of many obligors or in an economy populated with firms tend to occur in waves. This may simply reflect their sharing of common risk factors and/or manifest their systemic linkages via credit chains. One popular approach to characterizing defaults in a large pool of obligors is the Poisson intensity model coupled with stochastic covariates. A constraining feature of such models is that defaults of different obligors are independent events after conditioning on the covariates, which makes them ill-suited for modeling clustered defaults. Although individual default intensities under such models can be high and correlated via the stochastic covariates, joint default rates will always be zero, because the joint default probabilities are in the order of the length of time squared or higher. In this paper, we develop a hierarchical intensity model with three layers of shocks – common, group-specific and individual. When a common (or group-specific) shock occurs, all obligors (or group members) face individual default probabilities, determining whether they actually default. The joint default rates under this hierarchical structure can be high, and thus the model better captures clustered defaults. This hierarchical intensity model can be estimated using the maximum likelihood principle. Its predicted default frequency plot is used to complement the typical cumulative accuracy plot (CAP) in default prediction. We implement the new model on the US corporate default/bankruptcy data and find it superior to the standard intensity model.
منابع مشابه
Hierarchical Defaults in Specifications
The goal of this paper is to explain the usage and semantics of hierarchical defaults in logical specifications. We discuss the usefulness of defaults for different specification scenarios like specialization, aggregation, explanation, revision, etc. To understand defaults formally, we introduce a general framework parameterized on the underlying logical institution extended by an instantiation...
متن کاملHierarchical Defaults in Speciications
The goal of this paper is to explain the usage and semantics of hierarchical defaults in logical speciications. We discuss the usefulness of defaults for diierent speciication scenarios like specialization, aggregation, explanation, revision, etc. To understand defaults formally, we introduce a general framework parameterized on the underlying logical institution extended by an instantiation me...
متن کاملfluff: exploratory analysis and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data
In this article we describe fluff, a software package that allows for simple exploration, clustering and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data mapped to a reference genome. The package contains three command-line tools to generate publication-quality figures in an uncomplicated manner using sensible defaults. Genome-wide data can be aggregated, clustered and visualized in a heatmap, ...
متن کاملA Framework for Cumulative Default Logics
We present a framework for default reasoning which has its roots in Reiter's Default Logic. Contrary to Reiter, however, we do not consider defaults as inference rules used to generate extensions of a classical set of facts. In our approach defaults are elements of the logical language, and we will deene inference rules on defaults. This has several advantages. First of all, we can reason about...
متن کاملRepresenting Defaults as Sentences with Reduced Priority
We distinguish between two ways of thinking about defaults. The rst way, in which defaults augment known premises by`strengthening' the underlying logic, is the traditional approach taken by most existing formalisms. In the second way, defaults are represented in the set of premises, but obtain their default status by having a reduced priority relative to the known premises. In this paper we: 1...
متن کامل